Analyzing the NCAA Tournament Success of Coach K, John Calipari and College Basketball’s Top Coaches

    The floodgates are open. After No. 1 seed Duke and No. 2 seed Kentucky lost in the Elite Eight on Sunday, two of the most accomplished programs in the

    The floodgates are open.

    After No. 1 seed Duke and No. 2 seed Kentucky lost in the Elite Eight on Sunday, two of the most accomplished programs in the sport won’t be competing in the Final Four in Minneapolis on Saturday, which apparently means it’s open season on the Blue Devils, Wildcats and their respective head coaches.

    Here are a few examples that are among the top results when you search “John Calipari” or “Coach K” on Twitter.

    Are Krzyzewski and Calipari above reproach?

    Of course not. After all, they did land the No. 1 and No. 2 2018 recruiting classes, respectively.

    But since when is making the Elite Eight some colossal failure?

    In the words of Krzyzewski, “It’s disappointing.”

    “It’s not a disappointing year,” he told reporters after Duke’s loss. “Like, there’s a big difference. Like, this team put themselves in a position to go for it and had a chance for it. And, so, it’s disappointing that they didn’t get there. But I’m proud of them.”

    Duke lost by one point to No. 2 seed Michigan State and Kentucky lost in overtime. It’s not hard to envision a scenario in which the Blue Devils and Wildcats are still playing in the NCAA Tournament.

    Many of the arguments against Coach K and Coach Cal aren’t just about their roster management or in-game coaching during the 2019 NCAA Tournament or the season as a whole, but suggest a larger narrative of underachievement.

    Krzyzewski and Calipari are both members of the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame and they’re two of the eight active NCAA Division I men’s basketball head coaches who have won a national championship.

    In order to help you debate the merits, successes and failures of Coach K, Cal and their peers, we’ve done some research to make sure any argument online is between well-informed parties.

    [RELATED: Up-to-Date List of College Basketball Coaching Changes]

    Here are the eight active coaches who have won a national championship broken down by how often they’ve made the NCAA Tournament and advanced in the tournament in their respective careers.

    For the columns labeled Sweet 16, Elite Eight and Final Four, the number listed indicates how many times that coach has advanced to that round in the tournament, not how many times his team has exited in that round. The coaches are listed in descending order of national championships, then in descending order of Final Four appearances.

    Coach Number of Seasons NCAA Tournament App. Sweet 16 Elite Eight Final Four National Championship(s)
    Mike Krzyzewski 44 35 25 16 12 5
    Roy Williams 31 29 19 13 9 3
    Jay Wright 25 16 6 4 3 2
    Tom Izzo 24 22 14 10 8 1
    John Calipari* 27 18 13 10 4 1
    Jim Boeheim** 43 30 18 6 5 1
    Bill Self 26 21 13 10 3 1
    Tubby Smith 28 18 9 4 1 1

    Note: Stats courtesy of College Basketball Reference

    *Had two Final Fours vacated, reflected in the numbers from “NCAA Tournament App.” through “Final Four” 

    **Had 101 wins vacated, including four NCAA Tournament appearances and an Elite Eight, which are reflected above, although Syracuse claims all of its NCAA Tournament appearances

    Obviously the numbers listed above can favor coaches who have spent more time on the sideline running a DI program. So here is the same information but presented in terms of efficiency, meaning what percentage of the time does each coach’s team make the NCAA Tournament, advance to the Sweet 16, win the national championship, etc.?

    Since Duke and Kentucky losing in the Elite Eight was the impetus for much of the recent conversation online about Krzyzewski and Calipari’s (in)ability to live up to expectations, the table below lists the active coaches who have won a national championship in descending order of Final Four percentage.

    Coach Number of Seasons NCAA Tournament App. Sweet 16 Elite Eight Final Four National Championship
    Tom Izzo 24 91.7% 58.3% 41.7% 33.3% 4.2%
    Roy Williams 31 93.5% 61.3% 41.9% 29.0% 9.7%
    Mike Krzyzewski 44 79.5% 56.8% 36.4% 27.3% 11.4%
    John Calipari* 27 66.7% 48.1% 37.0% 14.8% 3.7%
    Jay Wright 25 64.0% 24.0% 16.0% 12.0% 8.0%
    Jim Boeheim** 43 69.8% 41.9% 14.0% 11.6% 2.3%
    Bill Self 26 80.8% 50.0% 38.5% 11.5% 3.8%
    Tubby Smith 28 64.3% 32.1% 14.3% 3.6% 3.6%

    *Had two Final Fours vacated, reflected in the numbers from “NCAA Tournament App.” through “Final Four” 

    **Had 101 wins vacated, including four NCAA Tournament appearances and an Elite Eight, which are reflected above, although Syracuse claims all of its NCAA Tournament appearances

     

    There are 19 active coaches who have made a Final Four, but haven’t won a national championship.

    They’re listed below in descending order of Final Four appearances, then Elite Eight appearances, then Sweet 16 appearances, then NCAA Tournament appearances.

    Coach Number of Seasons NCAA Tournament App. Sweet 16 Elite Eight Final Four
    Ben Howland 23 11 5 3 3
    Bob Huggins 34 24 9 4 2
    John Beilein 27 13 7 4 2
    Lon Kruger 33 19 5 3 2
    Mark Few 20 20 9 3 1
    Rick Barnes 32 24 7 3 1
    Bruce Pearl 15 10 5 2 1
    Kelvin Sampson 26 16 4 2 1
    Dana Altman 30 14 4 2 1
    Bruce Weber 21 13 4 2 1
    Tony Bennett 13 9 4 2 1
    Frank Martin 12 5 2 2 1
    Chris Beard 4 3 2 2 1
    Tom Crean 19 9 4 1 1
    Jim Larranaga 33 9 3 1 1
    Gregg Marshall 21 14 2 1 1
    Mike Davis 19 9 1 1 1
    Shaka Smart 10 7 1 1 1
    Porter Moser 15 1 1 1 1

     

    Now, here are those same 19 coaches but listed in descending order of the percent of their seasons that they have advanced to the second weekend of the NCAA Tournament.

    Coach Number of Seasons NCAA Tournament App. Sweet 16 Elite Eight Final Four
    Chris Beard 4 75.0% 50.0% 50.0% 25.0%
    Mark Few 20 100.0% 45.0% 15.0% 5.0%
    Bruce Pearl 15 66.7% 33.3% 13.3% 6.7%
    Tony Bennett 13 69.2% 30.8% 15.4% 7.7%
    Bob Huggins 34 70.6% 26.5% 11.8% 5.9%
    John Beilein 27 48.1% 25.9% 14.8% 7.4%
    Rick Barnes 32 75.0% 21.9% 9.4% 3.1%
    Ben Howland 23 47.8% 21.7% 13.0% 13.0%
    Tom Crean 19 47.4% 21.1% 5.3% 5.3%
    Bruce Weber 21 61.9% 19.0% 9.5% 4.8%
    Frank Martin 12 41.7% 16.7% 16.7% 8.3%
    Kelvin Sampson 26 61.5% 15.4% 7.7% 3.8%
    Lon Kruger 33 57.6% 15.2% 9.1% 6.1%
    Dana Altman 30 46.7% 13.3% 6.7% 3.3%
    Shaka Smart 10 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
    Gregg Marshall 21 66.7% 9.5% 4.8% 4.8%
    Jim Larranaga 33 27.3% 9.1% 3.0% 3.0%
    Porter Moser 15 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7%
    Mike Davis 19 47.4% 5.3% 5.3% 5.3%

     

    Ultimately, like many arguments, there’s data available to support either side.

    But the reality of the NCAA Tournament – what makes it so entertaining on an annual basis, without fail – is that it’s a 68-team, single-elimination tournament of 40-minute basketball games between 18 to 22-year-old players. It’s unpredictable and almost every team that makes the Final Four needs a stroke of luck, or at least good fortune, somewhere along the way.

    If Krzyzewski, who’s won the national championship in roughly 11 percent of the seasons that he’s coached, and Calipari, who has advanced to the Elite Eight in almost 45 percent of his seasons, have underachieved in their careers in the eyes of some college basketball fans, then maybe we need to examine what “underachieving” truly means.

    MORE: Up-To-Date List of College Basketball Players Who Declared for 2019 NBA Draft

    DOWNLOAD THE APP

    Have the full Stadium experience

    Watch with friends

    Get rewards

    Join the discussion